Schools Aren’t Prisons. So Why Do So Many Kids Spend the Day Like They’re In One?
- Kayt
- 2 days ago
- 8 min read
I need to say this up front: I’m not writing this to dunk on teachers, principals, bus drivers, or public schools. I’m currently teaching a high school class. My husband has spent his entire career in education. We both know schools are trying to do a hard job in a country that asks them to be everything at once: classroom, counselor, cafeteria, clinic, security checkpoint, social safety net, and sometimes, heartbreakingly, fortress.
Still, after a semester inside a small-town school building, I keep coming back to one uncomfortable thought: for a lot of kids, the school day can feel less like a place built for human development and more like a place built for containment. Turns out research backs this up. When kids get less daylight, less fresh air, less unstructured movement, and less outdoor time, they lose something very real.
I’m not saying schools are literally prisons. That’s too broad, and it flattens the reality that schools also hold caring adults, good instruction, friendship, and opportunity. But the phrase “school-to-prison pipeline” is not rhetorical fluff, either. It is a documented research and policy framework used to describe how exclusionary discipline and punitive systems can push some students, especially students with disabilities and students of color, out of classrooms and toward the justice system.
The part that got under my skin
Here’s what I’ve seen as a parent, and now as an instructor, and what a lot of families already know by heart: students up before dawn, bus rides that can stretch for hours in rural districts, a school day that runs from early morning into late afternoon, four-minute class changes, stale air, sealed windows, fluorescent lights, limited time outside, and after that, work shifts, clubs, practice, homework, and a rinse-repeat schedule that leaves almost no margin for being a kid in the natural world. Some of that is anecdotal. Some of it varies wildly by district. But the broader concern behind it is backed by evidence: children benefit from outdoor time during the school day, and many school environments make it hard to get enough of it.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says recess and school-day movement benefit students socially, emotionally, and academically, and notes that this applies across K–12, even if older students don’t always call it “recess.” Older guidance from CDC also recommends at least 20 minutes of daily recess for all students K–12 and says schools should not withhold it for discipline. That’s a pretty clear signal that time to move and reset is not fluff. It’s part of how school works better.
Kids are not disembodied brains
This feels obvious, but apparently I need to say it anyway: kids are bodies. They are lungs, eyes, nervous systems, attention spans, circadian rhythms, sensory needs, and a whole lot of growing bones attached to those algebra assignments. When we design a school day as if learning happens from the neck up, we’re missing the point.
A 2022 systematic review of nature-specific outdoor learning found measurable socio-emotional, academic, and well-being benefits and concluded that outdoor learning should be incorporated into every child’s school experience. Another recent review focused on outdoor time in schools found that consistent outdoor time can support student well-being and academic success. Schoolyard greening research also links greener school environments with better mental well-being, overall health, and cognitive development in children.
That does not mean every class needs to be under a tree. It does mean outdoor time should not be a reward for when the “real” learning is over. It is a vital part of the real learning.
Beige walls, bad air, and the myth that buildings don’t matter
I didn’t realize this until I started spending long days inside a school again: buildings teach, too. They teach with light, with noise, with airflow, with whether you can see the sky, with whether the room says “welcome” or “endure.”
The EPA says good indoor air quality contributes to student and staff health, comfort, and performance, and that adequate outdoor air is one of the basics. It also notes that dampness, mold, temperature problems, and maintenance backlogs affect health and school outcomes. In other words: disgusting vents are not just gross. They can be part of a larger environment that makes it harder to feel well and harder to learn. The EPA also points to benefits from daylighting and healthy school design for student learning.
That does not mean every school with sealed windows is harming children on purpose, or that every old building is failing students. Some schools are dealing with budget constraints, safety requirements, HVAC realities, weather, and facility rules that teachers have zero control over. But it does mean that design choices are not neutral. When kids spend most of their waking hours in spaces with limited daylight, limited fresh air, and little access to the outdoors, we should at least be honest that those conditions shape behavior and well-being.
Safety matters. So does what “safe” feels like.
Then there’s the hardest part.
I just experienced my first full school lockdown. The one window in the door to the hallway shuttered. Lights off. Kids huddled in a closet. Away from windows. Walkie-talkie chatter about a suspect moving through hallways. I was outwardly calm for the students while my own brain was running through every possible terrible thing, including where my husband was in the same building, whether he was safe, and whether every one of my students in other classrooms was accounted for. Those were some very long minutes.
Turns out, it was an outside officer testing the school to make sure proper protocols were followed. I’m glad schools plan. I’m glad they are tested. I am. But I also walked away with a question I don’t think we ask enough: when does preparedness start to become its own kind of harm?
The answer from research is careful, not absolute. It would be inaccurate to say every lockdown drill is traumatizing for every student. Some studies find that drills can make students and staff feel more prepared. But there is also growing evidence that drills can heighten anxiety and distress, especially when they are frequent, more realistic, or unsupported by mental health follow-up. RAND reported in 2025 that nearly a third of principals and teachers were aware of students experiencing trauma or heightened anxiety after drills. A 2021 study found increases in anxiety, stress, and depression language after drills. And the 2025 National Academies review said the research base is still limited, but documented concerns about mental health effects are serious enough to warrant attention.
That last part matters to me. The research is not saying, “Preparedness is bad.” It’s saying, more or less, “Be careful what you normalize.” When kids repeatedly practice hiding in silence from a possible gunman, we should not shrug and call the emotional cost background noise. And when mental health support after drills is inconsistent, that is a systems problem, not a kid problem.
About that “mini-prison” feeling
I get why teachers say it. I get why parents feel it. I get why students absolutely clock it.
Still, here’s the factual version: there is solid research on the school-to-prison pipeline, especially around punitive discipline, exclusion, disability, and racial inequity. There is less evidence for a neat, one-size-fits-all claim that school buildings themselves are “training kids for prison.” That’s more social critique than settled science. But the comparison isn’t coming from nowhere. When young people move through heavily surveilled, highly controlled environments with limited autonomy, little fresh air, restricted movement, and discipline systems that can feel adversarial or legalistic, it is reasonable to ask whether we’ve built some school experiences around compliance first and development second.
And some of those systems can look startlingly courtroom-adjacent. In some places, students facing serious disciplinary consequences may go through formal, tribunal-style proceedings, sitting before adults who determine outcomes such as suspension or expulsion. That may be intended as order, due process, or accountability. But for many families, and especially for students with disabilities whose behaviors may be tied to unmet needs or diagnoses, it can feel less like support and more like criminalization. That concern is not exaggerated. It sits squarely inside broader research about exclusionary discipline and the ways school systems can push vulnerable students further from support instead of closer to it.
So what do we do instead?
Not every school can suddenly become a forest kindergarten with chickens and rain barrels. (I wish they could!) But there are practical shifts that line up with the research.
1. Treat outdoor time like infrastructure, not enrichment
Outdoor learning, recess, and movement breaks are not extras for the “fun” teachers (that’s me!). They support well-being, attention, and learning. Even short, consistent outdoor time matters.
2. Design and maintain buildings like health matters
Indoor air quality, temperature, daylight, and maintenance are not cosmetic issues. They are student-support issues.
3. Make safety plans trauma-informed
Schools need emergency procedures. They also need to think hard about how drills are communicated, how realistic they are, how often they happen, and what support students and staff receive after.
4. Use discipline systems that keep kids connected to school
The strongest critique isn’t “schools are prisons.” It’s that schools should resist practices that unnecessarily isolate, exclude, or criminalize students, especially those with disabilities.
5. Ask the people living it every day
This one feels painfully obvious, and yet schools do not do it nearly enough: ask teachers and students what is and isn’t working. Ask them when the day feels humane and when it feels impossible. Ask where they feel calm, where they feel trapped, where they can focus, and what actually helps. Ask them what outdoor time would look like in real life, not in a shiny district planning document no one reads.
The people living inside these systems know things
Teachers know when policies look good on paper but collapse in practice. Students know which parts of the day feel restorative and which parts feel like pure survival. They know where the building feels welcoming, where it feels sterile, where stress spikes, and where there might actually be room to breathe.
We talk all the time about preparing kids for the real world. Fine. Then maybe we should start by treating their lived experience as real expertise. The same goes for teachers. A school culture that listens only from the top down is missing some of the best information it has access to.
The outdoor case, plain and simple
Children need more chances to be outside during the school day because being outdoors supports their health, attention, emotional regulation, and learning. And because the more school becomes about confinement, surveillance, and endurance, the more necessary the outdoors becomes as a corrective. Not an escape hatch. A corrective.
A window is not wilderness. A beige hallway is not neutral. A four-minute passing period is not restoration. A lockdown drill is not just a drill if your body carries it home.
Schools are doing a hard job under brutal pressure. I believe that. I also believe we can say, kindly and clearly, that kids need sky, air, movement, daylight, trees, and time that is not managed down to the minute. That isn’t anti-school. That’s pro-kid. And those kids are what every teacher and administrator I know goes into work for each and every day.
A quick note before you scroll to the sources: I’m not an expert in the education system. I’ve spent a few hours each weekday inside a classroom for less than a semester. That does not make me an authority. It does, however, make me observant. I’m also a parent, the wife of a long-time educator, and I know how my own body reacts when I’m cut off from nature, especially during seasons of round-the-clock responsibility and stress. I’m not an expert, but I do want to know more and do better for our kids. I’m leaving my full resource list here because this topic deserves more than a quick read, and because I’m guessing I’m not the only one who’s curious.
Resources:
